Practicing medicine without a license is a criminal act in all 50 states. About 100 years ago, the AMA began getting rid of the competition by pushing through legislation (state by state) which criminalized the act without a license. The “practice of medicine” INCLUDES the act of prescribing drug injections. Our legislators practice medicine without a license every time they draft, or vote “yes” on a bill that effectively prescribes injectable drugs. Only a qualified individual can be granted a license to practice medicine. A license to practice medicine can never be granted in a body politic, a corporation, or other “group”.
When injury or death result from the unlicensed practice of medicine, it will be charged as a felony. There are no exceptions to these criminal laws, which are intended to protect public safety, and that would allow violations merely because the perps are “lawmakers”. They FORGOT to pass legislation that would grant them a license to practice medicine, or to create any specific exemptions against enforcement of these laws. When legislators violate criminal laws, and such criminal violations lead to mass injuries and deaths, otherwise applicable immunities are pierced.
Deprivations of rights “under color of law” which result in death can carry the death penalty. Right now, we have “lawmakers” who criminally practice medicine without a license, and who pass “laws” for the sole purpose of enforcing the rights deprivations required to coerce the public into being injected with their criminally-prescribed drug injections. They are passing so-called “laws” which preemptively strip people of their rights and thereafter condition the free exercise of these rights (the return of these rights) upon proof that the public has been injected with their criminally-prescribed drug injections.
“[W]hatever may be the case with respect to civil liability generally, or civil liability for willful corruption, we have never held that the performance of the duties of judicial, legislative, or executive officers, requires or contemplates the immunization of otherwise criminal deprivations of constitutional rights.” Gravel v. United States, 408 U.S. 606 (1972) Id. at 503 (emphasis added) (citations omitted)
“Especially is it competent and proper for this court to consider whether its (the legislature's) proceedings are in conformity with the Constitution and laws, because, living under a written constitution, no branch or department of the government is supreme; and it is the province and duty of the judicial department to determine in cases regularly brought before them, whether the powers of any branch of the government, and even those of the legislature in the enactment of laws, have been exercised in conformity to the Constitution; and if they have not, to treat their acts as null and void.' Adam Clayton POWELL, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. John W. McCORMACK et al. 103 U.S., 103
I am now challenging any lawyer to show me the LAW which exempts state legislators from the requirement of a medical license before they may practice medicine on ANYONE, let alone upon millions of people. Although there are many “regulations” which purport to allow legislators to prescribe this class of injectable drug, I see NONE which specifically exempt any legislative body from prosecution for criminal violations of those existing laws which prohibit the practice of medicine without a license. If you can find these exemptions, please do show them to me.
At a bare minimum, there needs to be a legal challenge against these “lawmakers” prescribing injectable drugs in violation of existing criminal laws, i.e., practicing medicine without a license. Criminal laws which regulate the practice of medicine currently stand in stark contradiction to those “regulations” which purport to allow lawmakers to practice medicine without a license. Being elected to office is not equivalent to being granted a medical license. These politicians are not licensed, nor qualified, to practice medicine, i.e., write injectable drug prescriptions for ANYONE.
Unless or until the VICTIMS start making criminal complaints, legislators will go on practicing medicine upon the general public. And they will go on doing so coercively.
The way they get around it is that it's Never the vaccine that causes an injury or death.
But Naomi Wolf and others are showing that big pharma has done fraud, so at least they can be sued.
This is exactly why state corporatism, aka Fascism is much worse than a dictatorship or state run industry. With privatization you can shift the blame onto a "corrupt corporation".
Crapitalism in action, the corporations are essentially only answering to their shareholders/ owners, even when they "follow ethics"
Can we also use these laws to hold justices accountable for practicing medicine without a license?
Justices have been upholding the forced administration of these shots to members of the military and the medical fields. If we can use this to stop them, it would greatly protect those whose jobs remain in jeopardy.