Good write up Joy. Thanks... We have written a pdf search tool onto the Pfizer documents called Abstractor (https://vaccines.shinyapps.io/abstractor/) and are currently translating the trial data (.xpt SaS files) into something that can also be searched.
This is pretty meaningful to me and proves fraud. I sensed there must be something wrong with the numbers of the study and I supposed they were able to introduce placebos to keep the negative side effects down, but simply dialing out the injured and killed did not cross my mind. I'm sharing this where I can but I don't have a big following. I've been permanently removed from twitter, and shadow-banned on facebook. I'll try GAB.
Oh, the other thing to search/confirm is that they appear to have been doing "mix and match" with the so-called "placebos" in their studies. They labelled people as "placebos" on the 1st jab, but then, they mixed these people into the jabbed group on the 2nd doses. In the end, it appears they KEPT the "placebo" label for these people, even though they DID get the vaccine on the 2nd round! Nasty, nasty, fraud, fraud, and then MORE endless FRAUD!
People see the words "placebo" or "placebo group", (in the final "safety" reports) and they logically ASSUME this means the person did NOT get ANY vaccine jabs. MOST "researchers" are ONLY reading the final reports, where the meanings of the words have been all twisted around, so that they are now used to express the OPPOSITE of what we think they mean. And they're not seeing what's BEHIND the nomenclature, or NEW definitions (that are the opposite of the normally understood meanings) created by these fraudsters.
These are the biggest con people I have ever seen put anything in print, (besides the MSM). Fraud in drug "safety" studies is the WORST sort, because it leads to DEATHS - or, for the communists/collectivists, it causes rampant destruction to "public health.
The "answer" is NOT to trust these SAME criminals to (some day) provide us with "safer" vaccines. If I hear THAT argument from another so-called "vax-truther" one more time I might vomit.
The tactic of excluding persons from statistics "proving" vaccine safety and efficacy is as old as Pasteur and the Pasteur Institute and the rabies vaccine. Pasteur gave special instructions to the institutes concerning a ten day time window after vaccination.
This was from the data dump collation published by the ICAN.
I just checked the link where I found this, (and posted it with my article) and it appears they've taken it down, which is HORRIFYING in it's implications, since I TRUSTED ICAN (although I did have reason to suspect controlled opposition).
I believe I did download and save this particular document however. Please write me at joycontrolgroup@protonmail.com and I will do my best to locate this imperative document and forward it to you as an attachment. It seems most everyone has overlooked this, and yet, it's the clear smoking gun on those shitty trials. I guess this was too much of a "hot tamale" even for ICAN to keep on their website. It was hidden amongst thousands of documents and took me a considerable amount of time and trouble to locate.
Word go over to the top at ICAN (as soon I published my findings) but it never occurred to me the result might be that that they would take it down! Ouch. Write me. I am certain I downloaded it.
Yes. This is the one Pfizer fought to prevent disclosure of for 75 years. And ICNA published it raw initially. I have not followed up since my discovery of what I had, at that time, viewed to be the most imperative evidence of outright fraud on the safety.
They hid it in the pile of PDFs, about 75% deep into the mess of mislabeled files.
Wondering if you've heard lately that Pfizer, along with the rest of the "vaccine" makers, aren't even the real manufacturers... It's the DOD.
Yes, you read that right. The fucking DOD... DARPA...
I have a very well-researched and well-documented book by a gal named Annie Jacobsen... "The Pentagon's Brain." In the last chapters she talks about how DARPA is getting into the VACCINE industry... om effing g. NOW we see the results... That book came out in 2015.
Saw you on Igor's page... Signing up for yours. Can't afford to pay you, as I have no work anymore (working on that! lol) ... But good to "meet" you. Cheers!
As I understand it, DOD made the contracts, not the injectable, large-scale "countermeasures" manufacturing demonstrations themselves, which were done by Pfizer, BioNtech and a Chinese company.
And MOST of the ingredients for the jabs come directly from CHINA.
Our DOD is run by the Chicoms, and the WEF runs the Chicoms. China is serving as the muscle to rig our elections and ultimately END this Nation forever. The CCP model is the chosen model for the NWO.
China may not be perfect, but the idea that they are somehow causing us these problems is pure propaganda, in my view. Show me proof and I'll think about it! But remember how pervasive the US propaganda machine IS... They are freaking out because we're onto them, and they know WE know, and word is spreading, that this whole Covid thing is an EVIL HOAX.
This is war, but it ain't with China. It's our own US Oligarchy and the Oligarchy behind the curtain...
Biden works for the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the CCP. Communist China is the WEF's chosen model for their NWO. I have no problem with the Chinese people at large. Nor do I suggest we need to go to war with anyone.
I believe there to be a campaign to distract us from looking directly at the people responsible for Covid malfeasance (all of it), those people being a small crowd of oligarchs, corporate schemers, medical criminals, governmental criminals, the CIA and other Deep State actors, and the US MIC, specifically DARPA.
Pointing fingers at China and Russia is supposed to make us believe THEY are causing this genocide and the NWO, when really, the evidence is already WELL ESTABLISHED that it is Soros, Bill Gates, yes, Klown Schwab and the WEF, the WHO, the CDC, FDA, et cetera... and while China might have some questionable "social scoring" issues, the ENTIRE IDEA of blaming China is to take the spotlight OFF the US, and distract us. It's a VERY common technique. I don't think you're going to change your mind, which is fine, but I'm saying this in case other people might engage their thinking around the idea that there is a LOT of distraction, misdirection, outright lying, and attempting to distort and confuse the issues because the US is going to go down, and it's going to be very painful. The people we're talking about WOULD go to war, have done so many, many, many times, and are willing to consider NUCLEAR WAR, to keep their foothold on the necks of most of the world, while China and Russia are simply working around them.
My hat is off to you for the great work. I think your autocorrect is changing red herring to red hearing though. No worries mine always changes Steve Kirsch to Steve Kirsche. ;) This is really mind blowing stuff I'm going to piggyback off of...hopefully it will get the attention it deserves...
Cool. Glad you took note. It seems everyone digging into the data is lost in the forest. Most of them START with the final safety report, and walk away with the idea only 1% or so were "excluded" and that ends their inquiry. The pages (over 1,400 of them) where the TRUE list of exclusions are located, seems to have slipped past most researchers. It wasn't easy to find. And even when you do find it, it's hard to count the totals because they did NOT coherently NUMBER these entries. And the number of exclusions is different for each page!
To get around their "find the banana in the picture" game, I randomly sampled through the entire 1,400 pages to get an average number of excluded people -per page, then I multiplied this by the number of pages. It's well over 10K JABBED people who are never even mentioned on the final report. The "why" is pretty OBVIOUS.
Godspeed,
Joy Garner, founder of The Control Group
SEE our federal lawsuit demanding a nationwide injunction prohibiting all forms of discrimination based upon vaccination status HERE: https://informedconsentdefense.org/
You may find it would have been wise to have a look at Mr. Crawford's writings before accusing him of being a big pharma depopulation shill. https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/
I did not accuse him of being a depopulation shill. I only pointed to the fact he defends the very core narratives that are required to keep the hoax alive. It is anybody's guess WHY this is so.
Wow! That's a surgical-grade parsing of words! As to why he does what he 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴, it's for the sake of accuracy. If you're repeating inaccurate information, you only serve to discredit those who oppose this madness. Y̷̶̷o̷̶̷u̷̶̷'̷̶̷r̷̶̷e̷̶̷ ̷̶̷m̷̶̷a̷̶̷k̷̶̷i̷̶̷n̷̶̷g̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷s̷̶̷s̷̶̷u̷̶̷m̷̶̷p̷̶̷t̷̶̷i̷̶̷o̷̶̷n̷̶̷s̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷b̷̶̷o̷̶̷u̷̶̷t̷̶̷ ̷̶̷w̷̶̷h̷̶̷a̷̶̷t̷̶̷ ̷̶̷h̷̶̷e̷̶̷'̷̶̷s̷̶̷ ̷̶̷s̷̶̷a̷̶̷y̷̶̷i̷̶̷n̷̶̷g̷̶̷,̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷n̷̶̷d̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷t̷̶̷t̷̶̷r̷̶̷i̷̶̷b̷̶̷u̷̶̷t̷̶̷i̷̶̷n̷̶̷g̷̶̷ ̷̶̷m̷̶̷o̷̶̷t̷̶̷i̷̶̷v̷̶̷e̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷l̷̶̷l̷̶̷ ̷̶̷o̷̶̷n̷̶̷ ̷̶̷y̷̶̷o̷̶̷u̷̶̷r̷̶̷ ̷̶̷o̷̶̷w̷̶̷n̷̶̷. - You obviously haven't even read his material, one wonders what you were doing joining the discussion.
Attacks on those who are slamming pharma may be justified from time to time. But for me, when the enemy who is in the process of exterminating your species has been identified, it seems we might find better ways to spend our time.
He tells MUCH that IS true. However, this does not mean all that he reports is in fact true. People get addicted to the idea EVERYTHING emanating from this same source must therefore also be perfectly accurate, because that person appears to be on our side. But when I dig down, I often find the foundational elements being relied upon for foundational assumptions were studies (or so-called evidence) that was produced by pharma. Upon further investigation, I learn that the entire premise is baseless due to the foundational flaws.
I do not depend upon anyone for logic. And I recheck the foundations upon which others have formed their assertions. It is called critical thinking.
Thanks for the links. I am the founder of "The Control Group" (2019/2020 nationwide vax study) so you're sort of preaching to the choir. See our federal lawsuit, demanding a nationwide injunction against all forms of discrimination based upon vaccination status HERE: https://informedconsentdefense.org/ We COUNTED. We KNOW. We SAW.
Good write up Joy. Thanks... We have written a pdf search tool onto the Pfizer documents called Abstractor (https://vaccines.shinyapps.io/abstractor/) and are currently translating the trial data (.xpt SaS files) into something that can also be searched.
Thank you!!
This is pretty meaningful to me and proves fraud. I sensed there must be something wrong with the numbers of the study and I supposed they were able to introduce placebos to keep the negative side effects down, but simply dialing out the injured and killed did not cross my mind. I'm sharing this where I can but I don't have a big following. I've been permanently removed from twitter, and shadow-banned on facebook. I'll try GAB.
Oh, the other thing to search/confirm is that they appear to have been doing "mix and match" with the so-called "placebos" in their studies. They labelled people as "placebos" on the 1st jab, but then, they mixed these people into the jabbed group on the 2nd doses. In the end, it appears they KEPT the "placebo" label for these people, even though they DID get the vaccine on the 2nd round! Nasty, nasty, fraud, fraud, and then MORE endless FRAUD!
People see the words "placebo" or "placebo group", (in the final "safety" reports) and they logically ASSUME this means the person did NOT get ANY vaccine jabs. MOST "researchers" are ONLY reading the final reports, where the meanings of the words have been all twisted around, so that they are now used to express the OPPOSITE of what we think they mean. And they're not seeing what's BEHIND the nomenclature, or NEW definitions (that are the opposite of the normally understood meanings) created by these fraudsters.
These are the biggest con people I have ever seen put anything in print, (besides the MSM). Fraud in drug "safety" studies is the WORST sort, because it leads to DEATHS - or, for the communists/collectivists, it causes rampant destruction to "public health.
The "answer" is NOT to trust these SAME criminals to (some day) provide us with "safer" vaccines. If I hear THAT argument from another so-called "vax-truther" one more time I might vomit.
Wow. I look forward to reading more from you.
If you had not been "banned" this would mean you were not fully doing your job;-) TRUTH is what they ban...always.
I rarely trust anyone who has yet to be banned on at least ONE major social media platform;-)
HAHAHAHA! Maybe "trust" is the wrong word. I don't find people credible UNLESS they've been banned.
The tactic of excluding persons from statistics "proving" vaccine safety and efficacy is as old as Pasteur and the Pasteur Institute and the rabies vaccine. Pasteur gave special instructions to the institutes concerning a ten day time window after vaccination.
Do you know where the document you linked to is from?
This was from the data dump collation published by the ICAN.
I just checked the link where I found this, (and posted it with my article) and it appears they've taken it down, which is HORRIFYING in it's implications, since I TRUSTED ICAN (although I did have reason to suspect controlled opposition).
I believe I did download and save this particular document however. Please write me at joycontrolgroup@protonmail.com and I will do my best to locate this imperative document and forward it to you as an attachment. It seems most everyone has overlooked this, and yet, it's the clear smoking gun on those shitty trials. I guess this was too much of a "hot tamale" even for ICAN to keep on their website. It was hidden amongst thousands of documents and took me a considerable amount of time and trouble to locate.
Word go over to the top at ICAN (as soon I published my findings) but it never occurred to me the result might be that that they would take it down! Ouch. Write me. I am certain I downloaded it.
I have access to the doc (it loads). What I was wondering was what it came from, e.g., which FOIA request?
Yes. This is the one Pfizer fought to prevent disclosure of for 75 years. And ICNA published it raw initially. I have not followed up since my discovery of what I had, at that time, viewed to be the most imperative evidence of outright fraud on the safety.
They hid it in the pile of PDFs, about 75% deep into the mess of mislabeled files.
Wondering if you've heard lately that Pfizer, along with the rest of the "vaccine" makers, aren't even the real manufacturers... It's the DOD.
Yes, you read that right. The fucking DOD... DARPA...
I have a very well-researched and well-documented book by a gal named Annie Jacobsen... "The Pentagon's Brain." In the last chapters she talks about how DARPA is getting into the VACCINE industry... om effing g. NOW we see the results... That book came out in 2015.
Saw you on Igor's page... Signing up for yours. Can't afford to pay you, as I have no work anymore (working on that! lol) ... But good to "meet" you. Cheers!
As I understand it, DOD made the contracts, not the injectable, large-scale "countermeasures" manufacturing demonstrations themselves, which were done by Pfizer, BioNtech and a Chinese company.
See Sasha Latypova and Baliwick News Substacks
Yes, that makes sense. Thanks! My comments are often in need of updates, but I just don't think about it until someone helps me out. ^_^ Cheers.
And MOST of the ingredients for the jabs come directly from CHINA.
Our DOD is run by the Chicoms, and the WEF runs the Chicoms. China is serving as the muscle to rig our elections and ultimately END this Nation forever. The CCP model is the chosen model for the NWO.
Oh, I don't think so. No offense to you, but...
China may not be perfect, but the idea that they are somehow causing us these problems is pure propaganda, in my view. Show me proof and I'll think about it! But remember how pervasive the US propaganda machine IS... They are freaking out because we're onto them, and they know WE know, and word is spreading, that this whole Covid thing is an EVIL HOAX.
This is war, but it ain't with China. It's our own US Oligarchy and the Oligarchy behind the curtain...
Biden works for the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the CCP. Communist China is the WEF's chosen model for their NWO. I have no problem with the Chinese people at large. Nor do I suggest we need to go to war with anyone.
I believe there to be a campaign to distract us from looking directly at the people responsible for Covid malfeasance (all of it), those people being a small crowd of oligarchs, corporate schemers, medical criminals, governmental criminals, the CIA and other Deep State actors, and the US MIC, specifically DARPA.
Pointing fingers at China and Russia is supposed to make us believe THEY are causing this genocide and the NWO, when really, the evidence is already WELL ESTABLISHED that it is Soros, Bill Gates, yes, Klown Schwab and the WEF, the WHO, the CDC, FDA, et cetera... and while China might have some questionable "social scoring" issues, the ENTIRE IDEA of blaming China is to take the spotlight OFF the US, and distract us. It's a VERY common technique. I don't think you're going to change your mind, which is fine, but I'm saying this in case other people might engage their thinking around the idea that there is a LOT of distraction, misdirection, outright lying, and attempting to distort and confuse the issues because the US is going to go down, and it's going to be very painful. The people we're talking about WOULD go to war, have done so many, many, many times, and are willing to consider NUCLEAR WAR, to keep their foothold on the necks of most of the world, while China and Russia are simply working around them.
Excellent assessment of our situation. It's all vile and it wants us DEAD.
I read a lot. ;) But you got it. I have a motto, of late:
Resist Not Evil: Work Around It.
excellent work. I've being trying to point to some of the tactics https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/how-power-couple-pharma-regulation but I think fraud describes how they operate very accurately
Jo
brilliant work. strongly suggest you share with naomi wolf if you haven't already.
My hat is off to you for the great work. I think your autocorrect is changing red herring to red hearing though. No worries mine always changes Steve Kirsch to Steve Kirsche. ;) This is really mind blowing stuff I'm going to piggyback off of...hopefully it will get the attention it deserves...
Cool. Glad you took note. It seems everyone digging into the data is lost in the forest. Most of them START with the final safety report, and walk away with the idea only 1% or so were "excluded" and that ends their inquiry. The pages (over 1,400 of them) where the TRUE list of exclusions are located, seems to have slipped past most researchers. It wasn't easy to find. And even when you do find it, it's hard to count the totals because they did NOT coherently NUMBER these entries. And the number of exclusions is different for each page!
To get around their "find the banana in the picture" game, I randomly sampled through the entire 1,400 pages to get an average number of excluded people -per page, then I multiplied this by the number of pages. It's well over 10K JABBED people who are never even mentioned on the final report. The "why" is pretty OBVIOUS.
Godspeed,
Joy Garner, founder of The Control Group
SEE our federal lawsuit demanding a nationwide injunction prohibiting all forms of discrimination based upon vaccination status HERE: https://informedconsentdefense.org/
Thanks for sharing your findings- makes my head spin!
This is huge. You should send this around to the big newspapers and at least make them formally ignore you.
You may find it would have been wise to have a look at Mr. Crawford's writings before accusing him of being a big pharma depopulation shill. https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/
I did not accuse him of being a depopulation shill. I only pointed to the fact he defends the very core narratives that are required to keep the hoax alive. It is anybody's guess WHY this is so.
Wow! That's a surgical-grade parsing of words! As to why he does what he 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴, it's for the sake of accuracy. If you're repeating inaccurate information, you only serve to discredit those who oppose this madness. Y̷̶̷o̷̶̷u̷̶̷'̷̶̷r̷̶̷e̷̶̷ ̷̶̷m̷̶̷a̷̶̷k̷̶̷i̷̶̷n̷̶̷g̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷s̷̶̷s̷̶̷u̷̶̷m̷̶̷p̷̶̷t̷̶̷i̷̶̷o̷̶̷n̷̶̷s̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷b̷̶̷o̷̶̷u̷̶̷t̷̶̷ ̷̶̷w̷̶̷h̷̶̷a̷̶̷t̷̶̷ ̷̶̷h̷̶̷e̷̶̷'̷̶̷s̷̶̷ ̷̶̷s̷̶̷a̷̶̷y̷̶̷i̷̶̷n̷̶̷g̷̶̷,̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷n̷̶̷d̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷t̷̶̷t̷̶̷r̷̶̷i̷̶̷b̷̶̷u̷̶̷t̷̶̷i̷̶̷n̷̶̷g̷̶̷ ̷̶̷m̷̶̷o̷̶̷t̷̶̷i̷̶̷v̷̶̷e̷̶̷ ̷̶̷a̷̶̷l̷̶̷l̷̶̷ ̷̶̷o̷̶̷n̷̶̷ ̷̶̷y̷̶̷o̷̶̷u̷̶̷r̷̶̷ ̷̶̷o̷̶̷w̷̶̷n̷̶̷. - You obviously haven't even read his material, one wonders what you were doing joining the discussion.
If it wasn't direct enough the first time, I suggest you read his material- https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/remain-calm-and-keep-learning
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com
Attacks on those who are slamming pharma may be justified from time to time. But for me, when the enemy who is in the process of exterminating your species has been identified, it seems we might find better ways to spend our time.
He tells MUCH that IS true. However, this does not mean all that he reports is in fact true. People get addicted to the idea EVERYTHING emanating from this same source must therefore also be perfectly accurate, because that person appears to be on our side. But when I dig down, I often find the foundational elements being relied upon for foundational assumptions were studies (or so-called evidence) that was produced by pharma. Upon further investigation, I learn that the entire premise is baseless due to the foundational flaws.
I do not depend upon anyone for logic. And I recheck the foundations upon which others have formed their assertions. It is called critical thinking.
Thanks for the links. I am the founder of "The Control Group" (2019/2020 nationwide vax study) so you're sort of preaching to the choir. See our federal lawsuit, demanding a nationwide injunction against all forms of discrimination based upon vaccination status HERE: https://informedconsentdefense.org/ We COUNTED. We KNOW. We SAW.