After "The Control Group" study was peer-reviewed and published, "Snopes" writer "Alan Kasprak" contacted me in a (failed) attempt to "debunk" the study results. My responses below:
Hilarious how their writers actually take themselves seriously, (even at this late stage) and don't seem to realize that we already KNOW who butters their bread;-)
Great letter. And thanks again for your survey and methods with the unvaccinated. Your accuracy and methods are what drive these greedy liars into despair.
They are looking for an angle that will expose you.
Sad that a reporter does not aspire to learning truth about a topic but instead works for an agenda-
driven group that wants to destroy the credibility of genuine data and outcomes.
You have an accurate view of what's going on. These freaks are trying to help create hell-on-earth. They deserve the same punishments as the injectors.
Thank you! I am so very tired of people citing Snopes for their "truth." Seems it's been dying down in recent years. I guess hearing so many people laugh when they mention "Snopes" as a source, is finally getting to the zombies.
Snopes has this unfortunate history of writing headlines and trying to debunk things that are true while hiding in the fine print that the news stories that they're debunking really are true.
After the 2012 election, it got really obvious. After 2016, there was no going back.
Even before 2012--do you remember when the U.S. had wiped out tuberculosis in American cattle, and then some bureaucratic idiot decided that we had to let cattle into the U.S. from Mexico? It wreaked havoc for ranchers and dairy cattle operations. I have an uncle who ranches. He has lots to say about that whole debacle. I understand that he and other cattlemen have tried multiple times to get Snopes to set the record straight on that. Snopes absolutely insists on ignoring them.
The same for the issues with mad cow disease.
If the truth is inconvenient (especially if it's inconvenient for Democrats), Snopes doesn't want to know what it is.
And disease that were eradicated for humans in the US have come back with the influx of unmedicaly vetted illegal alien children spread through out schools the US.
Sadly so. There are also diseases that we have never before had in the U.S., that we have no effective treatments for, that are now coming over our borders.
Most of it is either bacterial or parasitic. Both CAN be easily treated with the typical "covid" treatments, i.e., the ones the FDA doesn't want us to know about and that are almost free, totally safe, and easily accessed. This would include your citrus bitters, turmeric, etc.
If you're relying on PHARMA for any sort of "cure" for ANYTHING, you've already lost the game;-) THEY WANT US DEAD.
I would also like to take this moment to clarify that they want us dead NOW.
They didn't always want us dead, and not everyone that even more recently got duped into supporting "Rockefeller Medicine" understood that that was the endgame, nor, if you ask them, are they necessarily in any sort of agreement with the idea of keeping all people sick all the time or killing off large swaths of the population. This frog has been well and truly slowly boiled...
In fact, I believe that a great many medical personnel were horrified to discover how their profession of caring for the sick has been perverted and twisted into such a horror.
I have friends and family working in/retired from the medical community who would have never ever willingly subscribed to or participated in that. I can appreciate that about them while understanding that the practice of medicine has been seriously corrupted and must be taken apart and all the evildoers held accountable and the foundations rebuilt from the ground up if we're ever to have faith and trust in our medical practitioners again.
All that to say that because there were good and well-intentioned people practicing medicine despite the horrific skeletons in the medical closets, there are also medical treatments that save lives even today. You may not want to go near a hospital to avail yourself of them right now (I certainly don't), but--sometimes we need this medical care. But I wish we didn't, and like you, I look for alternatives wherever possible.
While the treatments that work for COVID are effective across a wide range of health issues, they won't/don't treat everything. I grew up overseas on a medical mission station among talented and highly determined (and creative!) medical personnel who hated to ever lose a patient--so please give me some credit for knowing. While there are good treatments for most illnesses, even those that are quite severe (Ebola comes to mind, as does antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis), my point is not that we should be afraid of these illnesses to the point of freaking out about the sky falling.
MY POINT: there are valid and reasonable reasons to STOP PEOPLE AT THE BORDER and effectively address their illnesses there instead of setting them free to wander randomly about the U.S. sharing the misery wherever they go.
Part of taking back our country effectively from the evil people who've seized hold of our government absolutely must necessitate restoring proper boundaries and enforcing laws regarding immigration so that we take the pressure off our overburdened infrastracture long enough to be able to reform it. If we can't find a way to do that, the resulting debt is going to bury us.
Anyone willing to publish so many lies, lies that he KNOWS will injure and kill people, is worse than a putz. But yeah, he does look like one;-) When I saw his mug I HAD to publish it. We should trust our health to this guy?
Question: How did the Control Group select Jan-Willem van den Bergh to do an independent review of the study in preparation for litigation in Garner v. Biden (2022). Who funded his work?
"independent review" is hyperlinked in your article
I'm a little confused about the mention of Children's Health Defense. Did they support or disseminate the study? Because I've never seen this info before finding your Substack.
The Snopes guy was trying to tie the Control Group study to CHD, probably because they've already smeared this group, and so he thought it would be a quick and dirty way to smear this study. He's just fishing. Nothing there. But my understanding is that the Control Group study got mentioned in RFK Jr's book. I haven't read his book yet.
You obviously haven't READ the study. The "Author" is me. This isn't an anonymous drive-by here. So address me directly with your attacks in your defense of big pharma products and the reliability of Snopes for truth.
Snopes is STILL claiming ALL vaccines are PERFECTLY SAFE, and that anyone who disagrees is insane. At this late stage, only a complete MORON believes that Snopes is a "reliable source" of unbiased "fact checking." Might as well cite CNN to prove the border is "secure."
The vast majority of subjects in the study were children whose parents were the reporting parties. And the majority of the parents were reporting on their later-born and unvaccinated children, who were unvaccinated BECAUSE of the injuries/deaths the parents WITNESSED in their first children immediately after injection. These parents are ONLY "biased" because they've personally witnessed the catastrophic health injuries their older/first child/ren from vaccines. And their ONLY "healthy" children are the younger one/s whom they refused to vaccinate.
Oh, and there was ZERO chance of surveyor bias because nobody was "selected" for the survey OTHER THAN based upon vaccination status. It was truly random. And an MIT Senior Research Scientist audited and validated the study. Her conclusion was that there's only a 1 in THREE TIMES THE NUMBER OF ATOMS ESTIMATED TO EXIST IN THE UNIVERSE that vaccines are NOT the actual cause of well-over 90% of the deadly and disabling diseases suffered by Americans.
Now, use Jim Carry's line in the movie Dumb & Dumber, "So you're telling me there's a chance" and go take your boosters, turn on CNN, and go to sleep telling yourself "The government loves me. CNN loves me. Big pharma loves me. They would never lie to me."
Your attacks on anyone who DARES collect the actual observed data and report it, makes it clear you want only to see MORE vaccine injuries. Go sell your "I love Snopes fact-checkers" and pro-vax insanity somewhere else. Nobody believes your garbage any more than they believe Snopes these days.
Who relies on Snopes for truth anymore? No one with brain cells.
Hilarious how their writers actually take themselves seriously, (even at this late stage) and don't seem to realize that we already KNOW who butters their bread;-)
Appealing to his "decency" is an utterly lost cause. These ghouls and demons simply pretend to be human.
True.
Great letter. And thanks again for your survey and methods with the unvaccinated. Your accuracy and methods are what drive these greedy liars into despair.
They are looking for an angle that will expose you.
Sad that a reporter does not aspire to learning truth about a topic but instead works for an agenda-
driven group that wants to destroy the credibility of genuine data and outcomes.
You have an accurate view of what's going on. These freaks are trying to help create hell-on-earth. They deserve the same punishments as the injectors.
You rock. Great article.
Thank you! I am so very tired of people citing Snopes for their "truth." Seems it's been dying down in recent years. I guess hearing so many people laugh when they mention "Snopes" as a source, is finally getting to the zombies.
Gotta love these "experts"
Meet Jeff: How Crimes Against Humanity are Perpetrated in Small "Fact Check" Increments
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/meet-jeff-how-crimes-against-humanity?publication_id=400535&isFreemail=true
Thanks!
Snopes has this unfortunate history of writing headlines and trying to debunk things that are true while hiding in the fine print that the news stories that they're debunking really are true.
After the 2012 election, it got really obvious. After 2016, there was no going back.
Even before 2012--do you remember when the U.S. had wiped out tuberculosis in American cattle, and then some bureaucratic idiot decided that we had to let cattle into the U.S. from Mexico? It wreaked havoc for ranchers and dairy cattle operations. I have an uncle who ranches. He has lots to say about that whole debacle. I understand that he and other cattlemen have tried multiple times to get Snopes to set the record straight on that. Snopes absolutely insists on ignoring them.
The same for the issues with mad cow disease.
If the truth is inconvenient (especially if it's inconvenient for Democrats), Snopes doesn't want to know what it is.
They hate America and are working fervently to destroy it.
And disease that were eradicated for humans in the US have come back with the influx of unmedicaly vetted illegal alien children spread through out schools the US.
Sadly so. There are also diseases that we have never before had in the U.S., that we have no effective treatments for, that are now coming over our borders.
Most of it is either bacterial or parasitic. Both CAN be easily treated with the typical "covid" treatments, i.e., the ones the FDA doesn't want us to know about and that are almost free, totally safe, and easily accessed. This would include your citrus bitters, turmeric, etc.
If you're relying on PHARMA for any sort of "cure" for ANYTHING, you've already lost the game;-) THEY WANT US DEAD.
Yes, but only after that take all our money.
I would also like to take this moment to clarify that they want us dead NOW.
They didn't always want us dead, and not everyone that even more recently got duped into supporting "Rockefeller Medicine" understood that that was the endgame, nor, if you ask them, are they necessarily in any sort of agreement with the idea of keeping all people sick all the time or killing off large swaths of the population. This frog has been well and truly slowly boiled...
In fact, I believe that a great many medical personnel were horrified to discover how their profession of caring for the sick has been perverted and twisted into such a horror.
I have friends and family working in/retired from the medical community who would have never ever willingly subscribed to or participated in that. I can appreciate that about them while understanding that the practice of medicine has been seriously corrupted and must be taken apart and all the evildoers held accountable and the foundations rebuilt from the ground up if we're ever to have faith and trust in our medical practitioners again.
All that to say that because there were good and well-intentioned people practicing medicine despite the horrific skeletons in the medical closets, there are also medical treatments that save lives even today. You may not want to go near a hospital to avail yourself of them right now (I certainly don't), but--sometimes we need this medical care. But I wish we didn't, and like you, I look for alternatives wherever possible.
Right on!
While the treatments that work for COVID are effective across a wide range of health issues, they won't/don't treat everything. I grew up overseas on a medical mission station among talented and highly determined (and creative!) medical personnel who hated to ever lose a patient--so please give me some credit for knowing. While there are good treatments for most illnesses, even those that are quite severe (Ebola comes to mind, as does antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis), my point is not that we should be afraid of these illnesses to the point of freaking out about the sky falling.
MY POINT: there are valid and reasonable reasons to STOP PEOPLE AT THE BORDER and effectively address their illnesses there instead of setting them free to wander randomly about the U.S. sharing the misery wherever they go.
Part of taking back our country effectively from the evil people who've seized hold of our government absolutely must necessitate restoring proper boundaries and enforcing laws regarding immigration so that we take the pressure off our overburdened infrastracture long enough to be able to reform it. If we can't find a way to do that, the resulting debt is going to bury us.
"Antibiotic resistant" is not a good way to say that natural and SAFE treatments are ineffective. PHARMA is "ineffective."
1. I never said that natural and safe treatments were ineffective
2. I can agree with you that most PHARMA is very ineffective.
He looks like a putz.
Anyone willing to publish so many lies, lies that he KNOWS will injure and kill people, is worse than a putz. But yeah, he does look like one;-) When I saw his mug I HAD to publish it. We should trust our health to this guy?
The link to the INDEPENDENT REVIEW gave me an "access denied" message
Can you locate me to the link you're talking about?
Question: How did the Control Group select Jan-Willem van den Bergh to do an independent review of the study in preparation for litigation in Garner v. Biden (2022). Who funded his work?
"independent review" is hyperlinked in your article
Here is where you can see Jan's report, attached to the declaration of lead counsel:
https://informedconsentdefense.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/filed-glaser-declaration-opp-to-mtd.pdf
Here is Jan's CV: https://informedconsentdefense.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/33-2.pdf
Thanks for the alert on that link that came from Alex's question. I will see about fixing it.
Thanks!
I'm a little confused about the mention of Children's Health Defense. Did they support or disseminate the study? Because I've never seen this info before finding your Substack.
The Snopes guy was trying to tie the Control Group study to CHD, probably because they've already smeared this group, and so he thought it would be a quick and dirty way to smear this study. He's just fishing. Nothing there. But my understanding is that the Control Group study got mentioned in RFK Jr's book. I haven't read his book yet.
Thanks. I'm planning to write an article on your study, which is why I want to get clear as much as possible.
Awesome. I hope the links helped.
Thank you. I hope that Alan - is it Alan or Alex? DOES have a shed of decency and has actually bothered to read your entire response.
To my knowledge, he has yet to publish a story on the Control Group study. So maybe.
You obviously haven't READ the study. The "Author" is me. This isn't an anonymous drive-by here. So address me directly with your attacks in your defense of big pharma products and the reliability of Snopes for truth.
Snopes is STILL claiming ALL vaccines are PERFECTLY SAFE, and that anyone who disagrees is insane. At this late stage, only a complete MORON believes that Snopes is a "reliable source" of unbiased "fact checking." Might as well cite CNN to prove the border is "secure."
The vast majority of subjects in the study were children whose parents were the reporting parties. And the majority of the parents were reporting on their later-born and unvaccinated children, who were unvaccinated BECAUSE of the injuries/deaths the parents WITNESSED in their first children immediately after injection. These parents are ONLY "biased" because they've personally witnessed the catastrophic health injuries their older/first child/ren from vaccines. And their ONLY "healthy" children are the younger one/s whom they refused to vaccinate.
Oh, and there was ZERO chance of surveyor bias because nobody was "selected" for the survey OTHER THAN based upon vaccination status. It was truly random. And an MIT Senior Research Scientist audited and validated the study. Her conclusion was that there's only a 1 in THREE TIMES THE NUMBER OF ATOMS ESTIMATED TO EXIST IN THE UNIVERSE that vaccines are NOT the actual cause of well-over 90% of the deadly and disabling diseases suffered by Americans.
Now, use Jim Carry's line in the movie Dumb & Dumber, "So you're telling me there's a chance" and go take your boosters, turn on CNN, and go to sleep telling yourself "The government loves me. CNN loves me. Big pharma loves me. They would never lie to me."
Your attacks on anyone who DARES collect the actual observed data and report it, makes it clear you want only to see MORE vaccine injuries. Go sell your "I love Snopes fact-checkers" and pro-vax insanity somewhere else. Nobody believes your garbage any more than they believe Snopes these days.